michiexile: (Default)
[personal profile] michiexile
I'm about to start the third or fourth day - in a row - spent with trying to explain a homology theory for abstract simplicial complexes. There is an inherent orientation present in most sane homology theories; an orientation not present in abstract simplicial complexes as such.

I spent the better part of yesterday failing to prove that it doesn't matter in what way you introduce this orientation, since you'll get isomorphic complexes anyway. I ended up proving it, with some help and encouragement from my advisor, and writing it up while [livejournal.com profile] rockywuff, [livejournal.com profile] davidwithaknife, [livejournal.com profile] fluffboll and [livejournal.com profile] kandra where more or less waiting for me to actually get out of my chair and join them.

Now, as I sit down again, I have ideas to make the whole presentation slightly more .. decent. There I go again. =)

Edit/Update:
Well... Sort of. I'm halfway through rewriting when my advisor comes in through the door and thrusts a problem on calculating homology of certain simplicial complexes occuring in his Ramsey theory research on me. So I spend the day calculating the homology of the flag complexes of independent vertex subsets of two specific graphs instead.

Profile

michiexile: (Default)
michiexile

June 2014

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223242526 2728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 05:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios